Home / Social Issues & Justice / Oklahoma School Standards...

Oklahoma School Standards Add 2020 Election Disinformation to Curriculum

Left 100% Center coverage: 1 sources Right

Oklahoma, USA

May 21, 2025 2 Negative General

Social Issues & Justice Sponsor this article

Oklahoma, USA: The state’s new education standards mandate teaching alleged “irregularities” in the 2020 presidential election as legitimate debate points—despite repeated court rulings and data confirming no widespread fraud. Schools must also remove certain lessons on modern racial justice movements. Critics argue it institutionalizes political propaganda and undermines trust in democracy. Supporters claim it encourages “critical thinking.” Lawsuits are underway, with parents and educators challenging the standards as factually incorrect.

What this means for you:

•	If you have kids in Oklahoma public schools, review the new curriculum guidelines—decide whether to raise concerns at school board meetings
•	Teachers forced to present contested or debunked theories may need resources for teaching critical analysis ethically
•	The shift could signal broader attempts in some states to revise recent political history lessons—keep an eye on local legislative actions
•	Consider the impact on students’ civics knowledge if inaccurate narratives become standardized

Key Entities

• Oklahoma State Board of Education: Adopted standards that include referencing unverified 2020 election fraud claims.
• Superintendent Ryan Walters: An influential official championing the revisions, known for conservative positions.
• Parents & Educators: A mix of supporters (calling it “balance”) and opponents (fearing misinformation).
• Lawsuits: Filed by civil rights and pro-democracy groups alleging the curriculum fosters factual distortions.
• Black Lives Matter References: Removed from updated guidelines, part of broader changes restricting certain discussions of race and protest.

Bias Distribution

Left: 0% (0 sources)

Center: 100% (1 source)

Right: 0% (0 sources)

Multi-Perspective Analysis

Left-Leaning View

Decries the move as state-imposed falsehoods.

Centrist View

Highlights political motivations and possible chilling effect on accurate civic education.

Right-Leaning View

Might champion “open discussion of controversies,” framing it as balanced instruction.

Want to dive deeper?

We've prepared an in-depth analysis of this story with additional context and background.

Featuring Our Experts' Perspectives in an easy-to-read format.

Read Deep Dive

Future Snapshot

See how this story could impact your life in the coming months

Exclusive Member Feature

Create a free account to access personalized Future Snapshots

Create Account

Future Snapshots show you personalized visions of how insights from this story could positively impact your life in the next 6-12 months.

Tailored to your life indicators
Clear next steps and action items
Save snapshots to your profile

Related Roadmaps

Explore step-by-step guides related to this story, designed to help you apply this knowledge in your life.

Loading roadmaps...

Please wait while we find relevant roadmaps for you.

New Sign up to Create Roadmaps Free Explore All Roadmaps

Your Opinion

Should schools be required to teach claims of a “stolen 2020 election” as valid curriculum?

Your feedback helps us improve our content.

Comments (0)

Add your comment

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!