Deep Dive: Malaysian Cabinet Discusses Royal Commission of Inquiry into MACC Chief Azam Baki Controversy

The Malaysian Cabinet, as the executive body led by the Prime Minister under Article 39 of the Federal Constitution, holds authority to recommend the establishment of a Royal Commission of Inquiry (RCI). RCIs are constituted by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong (King) upon advice from the Cabinet or Parliament, drawing precedent from past inquiries such as the 1MDB scandal probe in 2018 and the Teoh Beng Hock death investigation in 2009. These commissions operate independently with powers akin to a court to summon witnesses and compel evidence, though their findings are advisory and require government action for implementation. In this case, the Cabinet's discussion represents an initial institutional response to public and political calls amid allegations against MACC Chief Tan Sri Azam Baki. The controversy centers on claims of a 'corporate mafia' involvement with the MACC, prompting demands for transparency from various stakeholders including civil society and opposition figures. The MACC's dismissal of the allegations as originating from an anonymous blog underscores the tension between official rebuttals and public skepticism. Anwar's confirmation after Cabinet meeting signals governmental acknowledgment without revealing outcomes, with a forthcoming statement anticipated to clarify next steps. This process highlights the Cabinet's role in balancing executive oversight of anti-corruption institutions with demands for independent scrutiny. Precedents show RCIs can lead to policy reforms or personnel changes, as seen in prior cases where recommendations influenced governance structures. For citizens, this could reinforce or undermine trust in anti-corruption mechanisms depending on the inquiry's formation and conduct. The deliberation occurs in a context of ongoing efforts to strengthen institutional accountability post-1MDB, where public pressure has historically driven such high-level actions. Outlook depends on the Cabinet's decision, potentially setting a benchmark for handling similar controversies in Malaysia's governance framework.