Stories that are getting the most attention from our readers this week.
Amid fears of price hikes due to new tariffs on Chinese goods, Apple stores across the US are experiencing a surge in panic buying. Customers are rushing to purchase iPhones, anticipating that Apple may raise prices to offset increased manufacturing costs. The tariffs could raise the cost of producing an iPhone from $580 to $850. While Apple has not yet increased prices, the company is exploring options to mitigate the impact, including sourcing more products from countries like India.
Tesla quietly launched an internal ride-hail beta for staff in Austin and the Bay Area, using “FSD Supervised” software and Model 3s fitted with passenger screens. Trips include a human safety driver for now, mirroring Waymo’s phased rollout. Elon Musk still touts a driverless robotaxi debut, but regulators and tech challenges cloud the timeline.
Volkswagen and Uber announced plans to introduce electric self-driving microbuses in Los Angeles, aiming for a late 2026 rollout. By blending VW’s vehicle engineering with Uber’s popular ride-hailing platform, the partnership seeks to accelerate adoption of on-demand, zero-emission transit. Though supporters champion efficiency and environmental gains, skeptics question regulatory hurdles and how quickly consumers will trust fully autonomous rides.
Cluely, branding itself as an AI-based “cheat on everything” service, debuted with a viral video demonstrating how users can lie to dates or pass interviews by receiving covert on-screen prompts. The founder raised millions in funding, claiming this is just another form of everyday tech assistance. Alarmed observers worry the app encourages deception, further blurring lines between skill, authenticity, and AI-driven manipulation.
With the US Department of Justice having won its antitrust case against Google’s search dominance, a second trial now focuses on remedies—potentially forcing Google to sell Chrome or restrict major device deals. But the legal fight coincides with a paradigm shift: AI chatbots are rapidly emerging as alternative go-tos for online queries. Google’s lawyers argue this underscores healthy competition. Federal prosecutors see it differently, claiming Google can still leverage exclusive pacts to dominate AI-based search too. The question: Is Google’s existing market power so entrenched that new challengers, like ChatGPT or Perplexity, can’t truly uproot it? The outcome will shape how search evolves and whether browser or device deals remain permissible.
A new debate has emerged over how we talk to AI chatbots: Should we say “please” and “thank you”? Supporters argue that using polite language with digital assistants can reinforce kindness in daily habits. Others feel it’s unnecessary, noting that chatbots don’t have emotions. Tech researchers highlight potential benefits of empathy training through interactions with unfeeling machines, though cynics worry about wasted effort or the environmental cost of longer prompts.
Twenty-one humanoid robots raced a Beijing half-marathon; only six finished, many overheated or lost limbs. Despite the spectacle, analysts still project a $38 billion robotics market within a decade as AI chips improve.
YouTube just introduced an AI-powered tool that lets you search for music by humming or describing the lyrics. The feature aims to make it easier to find those catchy tunes stuck in your head.
